|
South Asia and the United States after the Cold War
Rapporteur,
Satu Limaye
Back
to Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
New
opportunities are emerging for constructive and consistent
ties between the United States and South Asia. The ending
of the cold war removed the ideological and geostrategic factors
that shaped earlier U.S. policy in the region. The expansion
of democracy and the growing openness of South Asia's economies
have provided the basis to increase cooperation substantially
in areas of common concern and mutual benefit.
United
StatesSouth Asia relations have in the past been marked
by divergent perspectives and aims. Overcoming this legacy
will take time and effort. However, a reservoir of goodwill
toward the United States exists in South Asia.
The
task of The Asia Society's study mission to South Asia was
to learn South Asian views on key issues, explore the possibilities
for greater U.S.South Asia interaction, and make recommendations
about current and future U.S. interests and priorities in
South Asia.
SOUTH
ASIA AND THE UNITED STATES
South
Asia suffers from stereotypes. Americans have tended to regard
the region as one of poverty, overpopulation, ethnic and religious
conflict, and natural disasters. Contrary to prevailing American
perceptions, South Asia is important to the United States
and offers both short- and long-term opportunities. American
businesses can benefit from the region's economic opening
and growth. American universities, think tanks, and nongovernmental
organizations can widen their agendas and impact through collaboration
with their South Asian counterparts.
South
Asia's fate will increasingly influence the world Americans
and others live in. It is a region where the issues likely
to dominate international relations in the 21st century come
together and where 20 percent of humanity lives. U.S. interests
will be served if South Asia achieves sufficiently rapid,
well-distributed and sustainable economic growth, reduces
poverty, expands democracy, prevents regional conflict and
the use of weapons of mass destruction, protects its own and
the global environment, limits population growth, advances
human rights, and reduces narcotics trafficking and terrorism.
But if little or no progress is made in South Asia toward
these goals, the world will almost certainly be a more dangerous
and unstable place, with obvious negative implications for
the United States.
If
the United States is to advance its interests in South Asia,
U.S. policy toward the region should follow certain broad
guidelines:
·
Give
high priority to building and expanding governmental and
private-sector ties with South Asia as a foundation for
pursuing long-term U.S. interests.
·
Develop
a broad, balanced, and integrated strategy toward South
Asia that is sustainable over the long term.
·
Avoid
"tilts" in U.S. dealings with South Asia, while
giving due recognition to the size and potential of India
in the region and beyond.
·
Accord
a prominent position to the role of the private sector in
United StatesSouth Asia relations.
·
In
dealing with sensitive issues, work through established
international and multilateral institutions and mechanisms
wherever possible, emphasize private dialogue, avoid public
confrontation, and recognize the limits of U.S. influence.
ECONOMICS
The
most important U.S. interest in South Asia is continued economic
reform leading to faster and well-distributed growth. Economic
relations should therefore be the focal point of U.S. engagement
with the region.
Successful
economic reform and deregulation in South Asia will offer
extensive commercial opportunities for the United States,
especially in India. The region's huge emerging market, strong
institutional and legal frameworks, English-speaking professional
and entrepreneurial class, and impressive scientific and technical
skills are among its attractions.
The
long-standing economic presence of the United States in the
region and its heightened activity in the wake of recent reforms
have given it a comparative advantage vis-à-vis Europe
and Japan. Enhanced economic ties will help moderate U.S.South
Asian political discord and create a deeper private and public
engagement between the United States and the region.
Accelerated
and equitable economic growth in South Asia will also transform
the lives of millions in one of the world's poorest regions,
and over time will help to limit population growth, decrease
social unrest, enhance political stability, and reduce international
tensions in the region.
To
support and benefit from South Asia's economic reforms the
United States should:
·
Open
U.S. markets further to South Asian exports.
·
Avoid
linking human rights issues to trade or attaching environmental
and labor conditions to bilateral and multilateral trade
agreements.
·
Make
South Asia a major focus of U.S. government trade and investment
promotion activities.
·
Review
and revise cold warera export controls to ensure that
sales of U.S. technology and know-how to South Asian countries
are not unnecessarily restricted.
·
Actively
promote assistance to South Asian economies through international
financial institutions.
·
Expand
scientific and technical cooperation with South Asia.
·
Assist
South Asian governments in developing the technologies and
strategies necessary to feed their rapidly growing populations.
SOCIAL
CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT
South
Asian governments and peoples are working through democratic
processes to improve their countries' social welfare. Given
the scope of challenges and the extraordinary complexity of
the region, this is a bold social experiment. It affects one-fifth
of the human race and deserves international attention and
support.
Some
progress has already been made in limiting population growth
and raising literacy levels. Environmental degradation is
beginning to be addressed. However, much remains to be accomplished.
A key requirement for addressing these social concerns is
accelerated, well-distributed economic growth. At the same
time, managing population growth must be a priority if environmental
damage is to be avoided.
South
Asia's social development is important to U. S. humanitarian,
ideological, and pragmatic interests. Without such progress,
there are likely to be global reverberations. For example,
international efforts to limit global warming could be undermined
by the region's rapid industrialization and urbanization.
Successful social development, on the other hand, will highlight
the effectiveness of democratic and free-market principles,
serving an important American ideological interest. In areas
such as environmental protection, poverty alleviation, urbanization,
and minority rights, opportunities exist for shared learning
between the United States and South Asia.
The
United States can assist South Asian countries with their
development challenges. To that end:
- The
United States should maintain current levels of bilateral
U.S. development assistance to South Asia despite resource
constraints.
- U.S.
nongovernmental organizations should expand their work with
South Asian counterparts on a variety of development problems.
- U.S.
universities should seek greater cooperation with institutions
of higher learning in South Asia.
- The
United States Information Service (USIS) should maintain,
and if possible enhance, its libraries in the region.
- U.S.
environmental organizations should make South Asia a main
focus of their international activity through collaboration
with South Asian environmental counterparts.
- South
Asian and U.S. businesses and nongovernmental organizations
should form a partnership to study the application of environmental
technology in the region.
- American
businesses should practice environmental responsibility
in their dealings with South Asia.
- The
United States should work more closely with South Asian
countries in international environmental forums.
- The
U.S. government and American nongovernmental organizations,
foundations, and businesses should step up efforts, either
directly or through international organizations, to help
South Asians develop less destructive energy sources.
DEMOCRACY
AND HUMAN RIGHTS
The
enlargement of the community of democratic states that protect
human rights is an increasingly important objective of U.S.
foreign policy. American interests and values will be more
secure in such a world. South Asia's size and conditions make
it a critical area for the future of democracy and human rights.
Moreover, if the aspirations of South Asia's people are respected
and met, the long-term prospects for political stability,
economic and social development, and peace will be enhanced,
and this will contribute to overall U.S. objectives.
One
of South Asia's most promising features during recent years
has been the resilience and spread of democracy despite intense
economic and social pressures. In India and Sri Lanka, democracy
has persevered in the face of ethnic and religious conflict,
political instability, and the assassination of government
leaders. In Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nepal, free and fair
elections were held in August 1994 after years of military,
authoritarian, or monarchical rule. The full promise of South
Asian democracy has yet to be realized, but democracy is an
important bond between the United States and the region that
can and should be strengthened.
Human
rights is a delicate issue. On the whole, South Asian societies
have been and are committed to the rule of law and tolerance
for diversity. While large numbers of human rights violations
continue to be reported, systematic and sustained government-sanctioned
violations have been rare in the history of independent South
Asia. Ethnic and religious conflicts, the effects of poverty
and illiteracy, and local disputes are the main causes of
the region's human rights violations.
To
support democracy and human rights in South Asia, the United
States should:
- Highlight
South Asia's achievements in strengthening democracy and
human rights.
- Address
concerns about human rights in South Asia primarily in the
context of multilateral dialogues.
- Offer
to help improve the existing institutions that have shown
themselves most willing to address demonstrated human rights
violations.
- Urge
South Asian governments to allow representatives of international
and U.S. human rights organizations to conduct independent
investigations in cooperation with local groups.
- Establish
exchanges between American and South Asian legislators.
SECURITY
AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Over
the long term, economic and social development are the most
compelling security challenges confronting the region. Social
and political unrest will likely increase without progress
in poverty alleviation, population control, literacy, and
environmental protection. Such instability could pave the
way for demagoguery, uncontrolled migration, and violent competition
for scarce resources and exacerbate traditional security concerns
emanating from nationalism and territorial disputes.
The
most immediate threat to peace in South Asia is the conflict
in Kashmir. Both India and Pakistan divert huge financial
resources, vitally needed for economic and social development,
into military spending. A future India-Pakistan conflict could
conceivably involve the use of nuclear weapons and destabilize
U.S. interests in surrounding regions. Although both governments
deny having built nuclear weapons, both acknowledge their
capacity to do so. Both are also developing missile delivery
systems.
Opportunities
for security collaboration between the United States and South
Asian countries may expand with the end of the cold war. India
and Pakistan in particular, because of their size, geographical
location, and military capabilities, continue to have potentially
important roles in regions stretching from the Middle East
through Central Asia and from the Indian Ocean to Southeast
Asia, where the United States also has important interests.
The
nature and objectives of security cooperation will likely
differ from those of an earlier era. It should consist of
joint peacekeeping efforts under U.N. auspices, bilateral
and multilateral dialogues on strategic concerns, and increased
military-to-military contacts through educational and training
programs and even joint exercises. Such low-key cooperation
could increase mutual trust and enhance the prospects for
more substantive security cooperation in the future.
Given
the wide scope of security issues in South Asia, our recommendations
fall into five broad categories.
1.
South Asian Regional Cooperation
To
promote South Asian regional cooperation, the United States
should:
- Increase
financial and technical support to South Asian Association
for Regional Cooperation (SAARC)initiated projects
that would benefit all the countries of the region.
- Focus
attention on cooperative efforts to harness and share more
fully the river resources of eastern South Asia.
- Foster
links between SAARC and other regional organizations.
- Facilitate
regional confidence-building measures and dialogue to address
longstanding regional disputes.
2.
The Kashmir Dispute.
On
India-Pakistan relations and the Kashmir dispute, the United
States should:
- Continue
to express concern about the potential for a wider India-Pakistan
conflict, higher casualties, further human rights violations,
and additional drains on economic resources to arise from
the Kashmir dispute.
- Encourage
the continuation and even expansion of official and nonofficial
dialogues, within and outside the region, on the Kashmir
dispute.
3.
Nuclear Weapons and Missile Proliferation
Regarding
India's and Pakistan's nuclear weapons and missile capabilities,
the United States should:
- Address
India's and Pakistan's nuclear weapons capabilities in the
context of a global nonproliferation effort.
- Reexamine
present policy concerning nuclear energy cooperation with
India and Pakistan.
- Seek
to engage India and Pakistan in bilateral and multilateral
missile control initiatives.
- Continue
government-to-government dialogues on nuclear and missile
issues with India and Pakistan while encouraging an expansion
of official and nonofficial dialogues.
- Assist
India and Pakistan to avert accidental conventional war,
if they are willing to receive such assistance.
4.
United StatesSouth Asia Security Cooperation
To
enhance the level of U.S.South Asia security cooperation,
the United States should:
- Restore
or increase international military education training (IMET)
funding to South Asian countries.
- Arrange
periodic, perhaps annual, "security consultative"
meetings on a bilateral basis with South Asian nations.
5.
South Asia and the World
To
promote South Asia's fuller participation in international
and regional groupings, the United States should:
- Keep
under serious consideration India's inclusion in an expanded
permanent Security Council membership.
- Support
India's and Pakistan's inclusion in emerging economic and
political organizations, especially in the Asia-Pacific.
ENHANCING
PRIVATE-SECTOR ENGAGEMENT WITH SOUTH ASIA
One
of the most hopeful aspects of future United StatesSouth
Asia relations is the increased opportunity for private-sector
collaboration. Open markets and expanded democracy give American
businesses, nongovernmental organizations, media, universities,
and foundations a wider scope for cooperation with their South
Asian counterparts. Vigorous private-sector collaboration
will expand the constituencies with a stake in U.S.South
Asia relations.
In
order to take advantage of these opportunities, U.S. private-sector
organizations need to enhance their knowledge of South Asia
and their capability to interact with the region. Over the
past 25 years there has been an unfortunate decline in attention
to South Asia across a wide range of U.S. institutions.
Another
hopeful factor is the growth of the community of South Asian
Americans, now numbering over one million. The South Asian
community has just begun to be politically active and in the
future will likely play a significant role in the U.S. policy
process and in business and other professional linkages with
South Asia.
To
heighten the U.S. private sector's engagement with South Asia,
we recommend that several initiatives by various U.S. organizations
be undertaken.
- American
nongovernmental organizations concerned with issues ranging
from family planning to AIDS to environmental protection
should seek ties with their South Asian counterparts.
U.S.
think tanks concerned with international relations and foreign
policy should increase their capacity to analyze South Asian
affairs and develop joint studies and dialogue with South
Asian institutes.
South
Asian Americans should engage themselves fully in the emerging
agenda of U.S.-South Asia relations.
U.S.
business and professional associations should initiate or
increase U.S. national science organizations such as the
National Academy of Sciences and the American Association
for the Advancement of Science should focus more on South
Asian contributions to science and draw on the large number
of South Asian Americans in scientific and technical fields
for this effort.
Universities
and colleges should start or expand programs on South Asian
history, culture, languages, politics, religion, and economics
while emphasizing the region's importance in the context
of emerging global issues.
Public
education institutions such as museums, libraries, and world
affairs councils around the United States should give greater
attention to South Asia in their programs.
American
foundations focusing on a variety of issues should give
a higher priority to South Asia in their grant making.
American
media organizations should devote greater resources to covering
South Asia, and journalism schools and associations should
develop professional exchanges with South Asian counterparts.
|